Supervisors nudge Villa del Lago along

By Claudette Langley

Email this story | Print this story

Posted: Friday, July 25, 2008 10:34 AM CDT

Reasonable public access is the last sticking point in moving forward a project to build 30 townhomes at Lake Tulloch.

For four hours Tuesday, the Calaveras County Board of Supervisors heard testimony from property owners for and against developing a new subdivision on the site of the Resort at Lake Tulloch. At the core of the debate was ensuring easy passage to the water.

“There has been a lot of public opposition over the public access issue,” said Shawn Parr, the attorney for the applicants. “But whatever happens, the resort will be closing soon.”

Before supervisors was an appeal of an earlier decision made by the Planning Commission concerning the Villa del Lago development. At a June 5 meeting, planning commissioners decided not to certify the mitigated negative declaration and to refer the project back to staff for redesign.

Certification of a negative declaration relieves developers of the need to do a complete Environmental Impact Report, which is a much more comprehensive and thorough review of a project’s impact on the environment.

According to the California Environmental Quality Act handbook, a negative declaration is used when there is no substantial evidence that the project will result in adverse impacts on the land.

Abramson, Andreas and Bernadette, Trustees, et al., proposes to erect 30 1,900- to 2,800-square-foot townhouses on the 70-acre site. In addition, the plans call for garages and docks for each unit.

On Tuesday, the supervisors and the packed audience were shown brightly colored renderings of Villa del Lago. Architect Don Grover’s presentation switched back and forth from pictures of drab existing structures and parking areas to the clean lines of the Mediterranean-style subdivision.

However, many property owners weren’t swayed by the attractive designs displayed on a screen before them. Instead, one after another took the opportunity to decry what they said would be bring down the home values in their community.

It did seem that the whole project was a goner when Steve Felte of the Tri-Dam Project, addressed the supervisors, saying that the Army Corps of Engineers had placed a moratorium on any new docks.

At the conclusion of Felte’s remarks, Supervisor Tom Tryon questioned the need for the hearing at all.

“If there is a moratorium then what are we doing here?” he asked.

Janice Elliot from county counsel said that they were providing the applicant with a chance to be heard.

“They have to have due process,” she said. “That’s what we are doing here today.”

Being heard did seem to weigh in the applicant’s favor. By the end of the four-hour hearing, agreements had been hammered out around density issues and building over the water, many of the proposed units are on stilts and extend into the lake.

However, the applicant’s proposed 10-foot-wide area of public access didn’t cut it.

Supervisor Russ Thomas, who advocated for a very much-downsized project, spoke against such a small area.

“It’s like a sleeve on a jacket, I am just not thrilled with a 10-foot access point,” he said.

The applicants responded that they would be willing to leave the access as is and contribute $30,000 for improvements to other spots on the lake.

With that, the supervisors declared that the hearing would be continued until Aug. 12 for further review.

Contact Claudette Langley at (209)754-3861

Comment (2 comment(s))

Penny wrote on Jul 25, 2008 12:17 PM:

" Moratorium, boy how things get turned or misunderstood, I think the reporter better check on this one, because there is not a moratorium but there are rules to follow. "

Erin wrote on Jul 25, 2008 1:48 PM:

" Does this reporter ever get anything right? There is NO moratorium and the visitos were there because in 2003 the BOS (including Tryon & Calloway) voted to endorse and enforce the Lake Tulloch Shoreline mgmt Plan. The real issue at Tulloch is building out & over the lake. Tryon & Calloway have betrayed their own votes. "

Comments are posted after review by the Web master. They represent the opinion of the commenting party. While we encourage them as a way to further community discussion of important public topics, we reserve the right to reject or edit them.

How do I find my comments later? Articles change daily on our Web site. Please make a note of the title of the article you have commented on. If you wish to read other people comments, once the article is taken down, do an archive search by title to locate the comments that apply to that story. We appreciate your comments and participation on our Web site.

Please refrain from attaching links that go to unrelated sites as these will not be posted.
In order to post comments you will also need to provide your full name and the city or town of your mailing address (such as "Murphys, CA.")in the boxes below.

We are requiring the same information for internet postings as letters to the editor in the Enterprise to ensure that each writer takes personal responsibility for what they say in this public forum.

The Calaveras Enterprise is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Calaveras Enterprise spokespersons.

Comments are limited to 200 words or less.