You have permission to edit this article.

Who is ultimately responsible for our wildfire disasters, and what can we do? 

  • Updated
  • Comments
  • 8 min to read

Paul P. is a retired Silicon Valley firefighter who lives in Arnold. 

The cost of today’s wildfires is often measured in lives lost, buildings destroyed and acres burned. Just in the 2020 California wildfire season alone (through October 2020) more than 30 people were killed, about 8,500 structures were destroyed, and a record-breaking 4 million acres of land were completely devastated. This was double the acreage burned in 2018 and the state’s second-worst wildfire season on record. Costs for the 2020 wildfire season alone are in excess of $12 billion dollars! 

Due to the ever-increasing wildfire threat, homeowners and business owners in or near the wildland-urban interface (WUI) are basically unable to obtain fire insurance since the state has allowed most of the private insurance companies to pull out of the California WUI market. For those who are unable to obtain fire insurance on the private market, they must now turn to the state of California’s “FAIR Plan.” And, contrary to what the name implies, the cost of the state-run program far exceeds (usually four times or higher) previous rates for fire coverage only. Then, an additional and separate policy must be obtained for the remaining coverage such as theft, water, damage, etc. Insurance rates in the WUI have literally quadrupled with the state-administered plan, while it is the state who, in part, created this wildland disaster throughout our forests.

There is also a tone that state and federal agencies, as well as industry, are the problem and have a direct cause-and-effect on our increasing wildfire catastrophes. Since the early 1900s, The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire), the U.S. Forest Service, and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) have been tasked with “maintaining our forests” in California and other states.

In fact, the Cal Fire  “History Page” states that “Cal Fire is a State agency responsible for protecting natural resources from fire on land designated by the State Board of Forestry as State Responsibility Area (SRA). Cal Fire also manages the State Forest system and has responsibility to enforce the forest practice regulations, which govern forestry practices on private and other non-federal lands. Two major themes are attendant to the CAL FIRE mission. One is the protection of the State’s merchantable timber on all non-federal lands from improper logging activities and the other is the protection of the State’s grass, brush, and tree covered watersheds in SRA from wildland fire. … The U.S. Forest Service became the Nation’s primary instrument, for protecting natural resources on Federal land from fire and from timber exploitation. In the teens the National Park Service was established, and charged with protecting the Nation’s scenic wonders. Both agencies, however, were protecting only those areas of Federally owned land under their jurisdiction and such private in-holdings that could potentially threaten the well being of the Federal lands. The large areas of timber and watershed lands privately owned that were beyond the National Forests and Parks came under the State authority.”

The U.S. Forest Service webpage states, “Forest Service stewards an impressive portfolio of landscapes across 193 million acres of National Forests and Grasslands in the public trust. The agency’s top priority is to maintain and improve the health, diversity, and productivity of the nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of current and future generations. Forest management focuses on managing vegetation, restoring ecosystems, reducing hazards, and maintaining forest health.”

The BLM  webpage states, “The mission is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations.” 

We have to ask, have the actions of these three governmental agencies (Cal Fire, U.S. Forest Service and BLM) been successful toward their mission statements? Have the stated expectations, actions and endeavors of these three governmental agencies been effective in the competent management of our forest lands? The facts speak for themselves, and it’s obviously apparent with the rapid escalation of the recent massive, uncontrollable wildfire events that these three agencies have mismanaged and drastically failed at maintaining our forests in a “nature-like” fashion for many years. Their actions (or lack thereof) have directly resulted in the horrendous fuel levels that are now causing these devastating wildfires! 

Over the past 100 years, these three agencies have actually allowed and contributed to our national forests’ downfall by practicing poor fire management techniques, and they allowed the fuel loads in these forests to grow to horrendous levels. They have virtually mismanaged our forests from natural wonders to areas with vastly over-planted trees, thick underbrush, ladder fuels that extend from the forest floor to the lower tree canopies, sickly trees fighting for sunlight and water—not to mention the devastating bark beetle infestations resulting in huge dead stands of timber throughout our forests. 

These three agencies have managed to turn our “nature-controlled forest areas” into vast over-forested lands that can no longer protect themselves as nature intended! Our forests are now income-driven timber lands, whose sole purpose is to produce wood products at unnatural levels. We no longer have healthy natural forests, but unfortunately have “vertical lumber yards” throughout our state and nation! Surely, had the westward immigrating pioneers of the 1800s encountered our current forest conditions, their wagon travel would have taken decades rather than months due to the necessity of clearing a path through the over-planted trees that our forests now contain. 

To objectively look at these recent escalating and devastating wildfire events, one must look at all the factors involved. Fire requires three key components to occur: heat, fuel and oxygen, referred to as the “Fire Triangle.”

Heat is usually in the form of an ignition source, either from nature (lightning) or by human (arson, discarded cigarettes, accidental or equipment failures, electrical wires). The simple arc of an electrical wire does not solely cause a conflagration, but it is only one of the key factors that are now in place due to humankind’s 100 years of fire suppression. Actually, the equipment from utility companies has contributed to starting wildland fires since they’ve existed. However, prior to our current forest fuel loads, the fires of 50 to 100 years ago were easier to manage and  extinguish with minimal crews and effort since they weren’t the fuel driven conflagrations we  experience today. 

Fuel is the accumulation of dead, dying trees, over-planted trees, ladder fuels (bushes of  manzanita, poison oak, sage, grasses and countless other species) that have been allowed to  grow in size so that they span from the forest floor to the lower tree branches. It’s also the  accumulation of forest floor duff (also called detritus, duff and the O horizon). It is one of the  most distinctive features of a forest ecosystem. It mainly consists of dry, shed vegetative parts  such as leaves, needles, branches, bark and stems, existing in various stages of  decomposition above the soil surface. 

Oxygen is just that. The oxygen in the air that we and fires breathe.

One may ask, so what about “global warming” and its impact on our forests? Global warming is  indeed a factor in our wildfires since it contributes to the drying out of the fuels and reducing moisture and rain levels. Global warming also moves and increases the time the wildfire events occur, from later in the year to earlier in the year, or even throughout the year, instead of fires being “seasonal” as they once were. Unfortunately, California has always had dry, warm summers throughout my lifetime. And traditionally, July through October is “fire season.” Even though we’ve experienced a drought year this winter, it has only managed to move the fire season up a month earlier and perhaps extend it later into the year. After all, dry is dry, whether it’s in June or July. 

Thus, one can clearly see that the only factor that has substantially changed in our forest lands is the accumulation and increase of fuel levels. Fuel levels alone have transformed what were once manageable forest fires into raging, uncontrollable, devastating wildfire conflagrations.  

So what can and should be done to correct this ugly, intolerable situation? Is the hiring of additional fire personnel and equipment (planes, helicopters, dozers and engines) the only answer? Well, possibly. But even if we had a million additional firefighters and an air force squadron of additional aircraft, these wildfire events would remain uncontrollable to a certain degree due to the weather—the winds that these fires produce, the erratic and severe fire conditions they create, which are all directly due to fuel loads in our forests! In fact, the State Fire Marshal’s Office within Cal Fire, under their Wildfire Prevention Engineering Program, states that “Wildfire Prevention Engineering processes reduce or eliminate fire hazards and risks, and change the environment by removing or reducing the heat source, modifying or reducing the fuels (this is where our defensible space program resides), and modifying the act or omission allowing the heat source to contact ignitable fuels.” 

The only problem with the “defensible space” program is that the fires in the surrounding forests are of such magnitude due to the fuel loads that the individual property owner’s defensible space does little to slow or stop these massive encroaching fires, especially when they become crown fires.

Is there an immediate way to reverse these decades of mismanagement? What, if anything, can be done to reduce the fuel loads and the frequency and magnitude of these devastating fires in a timely fashion? Obviously, personnel and equipment are only a small part of a comprehensive plan that needs to be addressed in order for our state and national forests to survive, as well as provide those who live near or in the forest areas (WUI) a chance at survival and a reasonable amount of safety. Listed below are some changes we may want to consider in managing our forests: 

  • Stop managing our forests as if they were solely for the purpose of timber farms and stop creating vertical lumber yards, especially surrounding those communities near or in the WUI.
  • As a temporary stop-gap measure, create large fire breaks around our WUI communities. This would be labor and equipment-intensive and involve reducing all fuel levels (tree numbers, ladder fuels and ground fuels). These fire safe areas would have to be  measured in miles and create natural areas where “crown fires,” when the fire jumps from tree to tree, could no longer occur and natural or man-made ground fires could roam free to burn the underbrush without fear of  becoming a raging inferno.
  • To eventually save all of our state and national forests, it is essential to reduce tree numbers (and increase spacing) back to levels they were when the forests grew as nature intended. This must start immediately. Instead of trees being planted and growing  literally inches apart as they are now, reducing their numbers to reflect the spacing of a natural forest is the only answer. Reducing the number of trees and increasing their spacing will drastically reduce the likelihood of crown fires and, at the same time, allow for healthier trees not competing for sunlight and water. It would reduce the devastating effects of bark beetles and other insects throughout our forests.
  • Reduce ladder fuels.
  • Reduce ground fuels.
  • Once fuel levels are reduced, allow for natural or man-made fires to burn as nature intended (hopefully supervised).
  • If huge timber farms are still needed to support our building industry, then create these heavily-wooded forests in secluded areas far from WUI areas, with limited access and large fire breaks surrounding them. 

It’s obvious that any measures to undo humankind’s detrimental effects on our forests will likely take decades. After all, it took a hundred years of mismanagement for them to get to this horrendous  condition. Nonetheless, we have to start somewhere, and the current solution is nothing more than a stop-gap measure, for our forests will continue to deteriorate at a rate we cannot contain, and global warming will surely not go away soon. 

If these fuel reduction measures are implemented, then and only then will firefighters have a chance at returning to the days when wildfires were predictable, somewhat controllable and much less destructive. We need to think smarter, think for the future and not irresponsibly throw money at a problem, hoping it will go away. 

Don’t think that just because you live in an area that’s not in a WUI that you are free from the danger or harmful effects of these fires! The toxic smoke and chemical water runoff will plague us all for many years to come. It’s now in the air we breathe and will be in the groundwater and oceans for years to come. 

So, where do we go from here? What can we do as individuals who are impacted or may be  impacted by these devastating wildfires? First, if you agree with what I’ve written, spread the word! Post it on your favorite social media site, website, send it to your friends and neighbors or your local news station. Contact your elected officials, governor, insurance commissioner, state fire chief, or governing fire board and let them know your concern. Voice your opinion regarding the direction in which we should be headed! 

Lastly, I’m no attorney, but the fact that our state and federal agencies have allowed this to happen under their management is nothing short of irresponsible and criminal. Perhaps a class action lawsuit is in order to help those who have suffered so much.


Comment Policy

Calaveras Enterprise does not actively monitor comments. However, staff does read through to assess reader interest. When abusive or foul language is used or directed toward other commenters, those comments will be deleted. If a commenter continues to use such language, that person will be blocked from commenting. We wish to foster a community of communication and a sharing of ideas, and we truly value readers' input.